Enchanted by the utter complexity of life, I had decided to delve deeper and find some rationale and meaning behind every frigging thing in this universe.
There is a reason, a philosophy behind everything on this earth, sometimes it just takes us a little time and resource to find those reasons.
All opinions are personal, I never impose my logic on others.
Hypotheses means things yet to be proved, therefore I take full freedom to speculate and and deliver my thoughts on the subject. If I have insulted you or your religion or any parameter about you, do not take me seriously.
As soon as you visit my site (my property) you have to abide by my rules, i.e. think rationally and objectively.
This is something I am very passionate about, if you have any objection and you would want me to discontinue it, it won’t be possible. But that doesn’t mean I would not endorse dissenting opinion on this site. I would love to have healthy discussions as my theory goes “Absolute truth is unachievable, and we can only employ all our resources to get as much data as we need”.
You have all the rights to criticise and ridicule whatever I write here, I would only be happy if you do that. But to be able to assess the findings and be in a better position to comment, I recommend reading of these books, these are no banned cult movements, but widely accepted non-fiction as an authority in their subjects.
“I realise that some of my criticisms may be mistaken; but to refuse to criticize judgments for fear of being mistaken is to abandon criticism altogether… If any of my criticisms are found to be correct, the cause is served; and if any are found to be incorrect the very process of finding out my mistakes must lead to the discovery of the right reasons, or better reasons than I have been able to give, and the cause is served just as well.”
-Mr. HM Seervai, Preface to the 1st ed., Constitutional Law of India.
“A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the error into which the dissenting judge believes the court to have been betrayed.”
– CE Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States (quoted by Judge Fouad Ammoun in the Barcelona Traction case)
You can contact me at donnie[at]hypotheses[dot]in.
Also on facebook at fb.me/donnie.ask
If you would also like to write articles of similar nature, I would welcome you.